Skip to content

High Court To Hear Petition Demanding Netanyahu’s Removal

Israel's Supreme Court agreed on Thursday to hear a petition calling for the removal of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Israel’s Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice, agreed on Thursday to hear a petition calling for the removal of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from the premiership due to an alleged violation of a conflict of interest settlement.

“Netanyahu violated the prohibitions and restrictions that apply to him as prime minister” and “acts in a conflict of interest,” the petition states.

It claims that despite the fact that Netanyahu is prevented by law from dealing with certain issues, he “declared explicitly and publicly that he intends to continue to act in violation of the prohibitions and restrictions that apply to him in the position of prime minister.”

The petition describes Netanyahu’s decision as “tainted by an extreme lack of reasonableness.”

Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu gives a speech. A petition was sent to Israel’s Supreme Court was sent to remove Netanyahu from the premiership. (JACK GUEZ/AFP via GETTY IMAGES)

The petition was signed by 39 senior officials from business, military, academic and other backgrounds. At the top of the list is former IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. (res.) Dan Halutz.

Attorney Dafna Holtz Lachner submitted the petition on behalf of a group calling itself, “Fortress of Democracy.”

“The petition will be forwarded to the panel [of justices] for discussion as soon as possible,” said by the court.

Lachner expressed “great satisfaction” with the High Court’s decision and said the prime minister’s disqualification “is the required result, because otherwise “there is no meaning” to conflict of interest prohibitions on elected officials.

In November 2020, then-Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit determined that Netanyahu could not involve himself in certain decisions that could impact his criminal cases and therefore create a conflict of interest.

According to Mandelblit’s arrangement, which the High Court upheld in March 2021, Netanyahu could not take part in making appointments to law enforcement agencies, the Supreme Court or the Jerusalem District Court.

Netanyahu also could not influence ministers or officials with authority over issues related to his trial.

This past February, Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara told Netanyahu that the conflict of interest arrangement extended to his involvement in his government’s judicial reform program, something to which he strongly objected, referring to it as a “gag order.”

Israel’s Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara arrives to attend the weekly cabinet meeting at the prime minister’s office in Jerusalem on July 9, 2023. (GIL COHEN-MAGEN/POOL/AFP via GETTY IMAGES) 

“Imposing limitations on the prime minister, and in particular limitations implied by restrictions on his freedom of expression, actually harms the freedom of expression of millions of citizens who voted for him in democratic elections,” he said in an objection filed with the Supreme Court in early March.

Finally, in a March 23 television address, Netanyahu said he would no longer stand on the sidelines of judicial reform.

“We reached the absurdity that if I had entered this event, as my position requires, they threatened to compel me to take a leave of absence, which would nullify the results of the election and the will of millions of citizens,” said Netanyahu.

“No more. I am entering the arena. I am laying aside any other consideration, for our people, and for our country, I will do everything in my power to find a solution,” added by Netanyahu.

The High Court has rejected similar petitions in the past. In March, it rejected on its face a petition to remove Netanyahu and fined the petitioners, the Israel Democracy Guard, 5,000 shekels (a bit under $1,400).

The court said the petitioners hadn’t exhausted other options before coming to the court. 

“Turning to the channel of judicial review should be used as a last and not a first alternative,” said by the justices.

Produced in association with Jewish News Syndicate

Edited by and

“What’s the latest with Florida Man?”

Get news, handpicked just for you, in your box.

Check out our free email newsletters

Recommended from our partners