Conversations between bats might actually be light on substance, a new study reveals.
Study Finds Bats Are Kings Of Small Talk
CINCINNATI — A new study with researchers from the University of Cincinnati found that conversations between bats might actually be light on substance.
The study demonstrates how bats have evolved to rely on redundancy in their navigational “language” to help them stay oriented in their complex three-dimensional world.
“If you can make decisions with little information, everything becomes simpler,” study co-author Dieter Vanderelst said. “That’s nice because you don’t need a lot of complex neural machinery to process and store that information.”
University of Cincinnati researchers suspected that the calls of bats contain redundant information and that bats might use efficient encoding strategies to extract the most relevant information from their echoes.
Many natural stimuli encountered by animals have a lot of redundancy.
Efficient neural encoding retains essential information while reducing this redundancy.
To test their hypothesis, they built their own “bat on a stick”—a tripod-mounted device that emits a pulse of sound sweeping from 30 to 70 kilohertz, a frequency range used by many bats. By comparison, human speech ranges from 125 to 300 hertz (or 0.125 to 0.3 kHz).
More than 1,000 echoes were captured in distinct indoor and outdoor environments such as in a barn, in different-sized rooms, among bushes and tree branches, and in a garden.
Researchers converted the recorded echoes to a graph of the sound, called a cochleogram. Then they subjected these graphs to 25 filters—essentially compressing the data.
They trained a neural network, a computer system modeled on the human brain, to determine if the filtered graphs still contained enough information to complete a number of sonar-based tasks known to be performed by bats.
They found that the neural network correctly identified the location of the echoes even when the cochleogram was stripped of as much as 90 percent of its data.
“What that tells us is you can compress that data and still do what you need to do. It also means if you’re a bat, you can do this efficiently,” said Vanderelst.
He said researchers often can infer what bats are doing just by listening to their calls.
“Even if you don’t see the bat, you can tell with a high degree of certainty what a bat is doing. If it calls more frequently, it’s looking for something. If the calls are spread out, it’s cruising or studying something far away.”
Bats produce their ultrasonic calls with a larynx much like ours. But what a voice box. It can contract 200 times a second, making it the fastest known muscle in all mammals.
The nighttime forest can be deafening to people because of its chorus of frogs and drone of insects.
Vanderelst said the ultrasonic frequency, by comparison, is pretty quiet, allowing bats to hear their own chittering calls that bounce off tree branches and other obstacles during echolocation.
While bats use different chirps for navigating than for communicating with each other, Vanderelst said they’re all pretty simple.
But human language has lots of built-in redundancy as well, Vanderelst said.
“For xml, cn y rd ths sntnc wth mssng vwls? Take out a lot of letters in a sentence, and it’s still readable,” Vanderelst said.
The way bats perceive the world is fascinating both from biological and engineering perspectives, Vanderelst said.
“It’s like a riddle, looking at something that shouldn’t be able to do what it does. So the question is how?” he said.
“It’s given me an appreciation for the elegant efficiency underlying this system.”
University of Cincinnati graduate Adarsh Chitradurga Achutha was the study’s lead author. Co-authors include Vanderelst’s mentor Herbert Peremans at the University of Antwerp, Belgium, and bat expert Uwe Firzlaff with the University of Munich, Germany.
(With inputs from ANI)
(Edited by Amrita Das and Pallavi Mehra)