Skip to content
Menu

Australian Securities And Investments Commission Loses Case Against Payday Lenders

Payday loan firm Cigno has won its legal fight against the commission’s implemented ban on a “predatory” lending model

SYDNEY — The corporate watchdog, Australian Securities and Investments Commission, has lost a legal battle against a payday lending model that it says can charge customers fees up to 1000 percent of the initial loan amount.

The Federal Court on June 23 dismissed the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s case against Cigno and associate BHF Solutions, neither of which holds an Australian credit license.

“There was no allegation that the services supplied by Cigno were not genuine services provided pursuant to a genuine agreement or that the stipulated purposes for which those services were provided was a sham or any allegation that the services were not in reality provided,” Justice John Halley wrote in his published decision.

“The fees charged by Cigno were in exchange for, or the quid pro quo for, providing the services …. not for the provision of credit.”

However, Justice Halley admits the “precise statutory language” of the National Credit Code may have led to unintended consequences.

The corporate watchdog has lost a legal battle against a payday lending model. (Sora Shimazaki/Pexels)

“Given the beneficial and protective purpose and object of the Code, it might be thought that this produces a result that could not have been intended,” Justice Halley said.

The judgment comes after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission used new product intervention powers to ban what it described as a “predatory business model”, where a short-term credit provider and its associates charge fees under separate contracts.

The practice involved associate firms charging significant upfront, ongoing and default-related fees under a separate contract for management and administrative services in relation to the loan.

When combined, these fees added up to almost 1000 percent of the loan amount, with many financially vulnerable consumers often incurring extremely high costs they could not afford.

Australian Securities and Investments Commission defended its bid to ban the short-term credit model.

“Australian Securities and Investments Commission took this case in order to protect vulnerable consumers from what we believed to be a harmful lending model,” Australian Securities and Investments Commission deputy chair Sarah Court said.

“Australian Securities and Investments Commission will carefully consider the judgment before deciding on our response.”

Community lawyers and financial counselors have also backed Australian Securities and Investments Commission moves to curb the lending model.

“Australian Securities and Investments Commission did the right thing to initiate this legal action,” Karen Cox, Chief Executive Officer of Financial Rights Legal Centre, said.

“Businesses who engage in credit activities need to be licensed and subject to charging limits, but tricky business models like this take steps to evade the law.”

(Edited by Vaibhav Pawar and Praveen Pramod Tewari)

Recommended from our partners